Door 1
Ask a developer.
Then you wait two days if you're lucky and two weeks if you're not, for a change you could describe in one sentence. Most small teams don't have a developer, so the message goes to an agency that starts with “Help.”


A website rebuild and Claude setup for B2B marketing teams without a developer:
You describe the page you need, Claude builds it from your design system, and you approve it and ship it the same afternoon, all on a site we build for you on Sanity and Astro with Claude set up on your machine.
A client who moved
Frankly
2–3 hrs
Frankly's campaign landing page, built by their CXO with Claude.
3 mo → 1 wk
Mickey's estimate for 100 landing pages, before and after.
The website bottleneck
Your team drafts pages, copy and whole campaigns with Claude in an afternoon. Then the work reaches the website and stops, because there are only three ways to get a new page live, and none of them works.
Door 1
Then you wait two days if you're lucky and two weeks if you're not, for a change you could describe in one sentence. Most small teams don't have a developer, so the message goes to an agency that starts with “Help.”
Door 2
You open it once a month, so you relearn it every time. The line between editing and development is thin, and it's easy to cross without noticing. Change one section and the mobile layout needs fixing. Even when it works, it doesn't quite look like the pages your designer made. And Webflow never warns you what else your change just affected.
Door 3
Webflow's own AI is slow and makes mistakes, and someone still has to clean up after it. We asked one for a simple redirect last month and were told it was an enterprise-plan feature. The work moved. It didn't go away.
So the ideas wait. The campaign ships late, or smaller, or not at all.
The agentic website model
Webflow gave marketing teams something they badly needed: control of the site without a developer for every change. From 2018 to 2023, that was the breakthrough.
It mattered because code felt out of reach. That's no longer true. Marketers are getting technical, using GitHub and
Claude Code to ship what once required developers.

“Webflow used to seem easy. After using this setup, it seems so complex.”
What changes
You describe the landing page you need, and it's live that afternoon. It looks like the rest of your site, and nobody had to file a ticket. No crossed fingers.
Your team already writes the page with Claude. Today it stops there, because nobody can publish it. One step closes that gap, and it takes an afternoon.
Ask AI for smaller text and it invents an 80% modifier nobody wanted. The “Brand Rails” setup is why that stops happening, and why your team’s pages come out looking like your designer made them.
Leaving Webflow means you’ll need a developer again, right? Wrong. Your team keeps changing pages the same way they’d ask a person.
Three versions of your homepage behind a toggle, so you can click between them before you choose. One sentence to ask for.
The easiest thing you’ll stop doing: compressing images and hunting through ten open-source tools to do it.
What happens to the pages you talked yourself out of, once the website stops being the hard part.
“Which posts brought the most traffic last quarter?” A question you ask Claude directly, instead of waiting on your agency’s next report.
Your CEO forwards a Lovable demo, a YouTube build, a LinkedIn post about someone who shipped a site with AI in a weekend. You can do that. The difference is it goes out on your brand, through your components, and it’s still your website afterwards.
Something breaks at 5pm on a Friday. Today you message the agency and wait until Monday. Now you tell Claude what’s broken and ask it to fix it.
How to add schema, meta fields and redirects by asking for them in plain English. No plugin, no ticket, no enterprise plan.
How it works
Brand Rails is the system we build into every site. Claude can only build from components your designer approved, and every change arrives as a draft you preview before it goes live. So everything Claude ships looks like your site, and nothing reaches your visitors until you've seen it.
The rails came from our first three migrations and every mistake we made on them.
Positioning, messaging, visual direction and your core pages, designed by people with taste. If your messaging isn't settled yet, we start there, because a fast website repeating the wrong message is worse than a slow one.
Your site is rebuilt on Sanity and Astro, and you'll never have to read any of the code. Every section becomes an approved component. Then we write down the details Claude would otherwise guess, like what an active tab looks like, so it gets them right the first time.
A migration takes two to three weeks. With a redesign first, design and build run in parallel, so the whole project takes 10–12 weeks.
We connect Claude to your site on your own computer and walk your team through it. Then the new site goes up on a staging domain for a week, and you test it, break it and try everything before it goes live.
From a client who moved
When you don't work in Webflow every day, you have to onboard yourself every time, and you know that everything you do can still break. Now I basically just describe what I want and it updates. Our Tech BBQ landing page was done in two or three hours, and the full campaign was ready the next day. The website was almost the smallest part of it.
The offer
Most teams come to us with a site they like and a stack they can't ship from. That's the migration: same design, same content, same rankings, live on the new stack in two to three weeks. If the site needs rethinking first, we design it and then migrate.
Most teams start here
$5K–$10K
2–3 weeks
Your site as it is today, rebuilt on Sanity and Astro with Brand Rails and Claude set up, so your team ships pages from the day it's live.
If the site needs rethinking
$10K–$30K
10–12 weeks
Positioning, messaging and a new design by people with taste, then the same migration underneath it. Design and build run in parallel, so changing platform doesn't add a phase.
After launch, the only running costs are the CMS and hosting.
Why not just…
Each of these works for someone. None of them gets a small team shipping new, on-brand pages by itself.
Fast to start, and your CEO may already have sent you the Lovable link. But you become the person building pages at midnight, the pages drift off-brand, and they aren't connected to your CMS, your SEO or the rest of your site.
Where it stopsYou get pages, not a website your team can keep running.
AI writing into Webflow is slow and makes mistakes, and someone still has to tidy up after it. Teams that try it usually end up running a workaround on top of Webflow.
Where it stopsThe cleanup still lands on a person.
They move your content to a better CMS and leave. It's a one-off engineering project with no shipping layer on top, so your team is no faster than before.
Where it stopsNew pages still need someone technical.
Prismic, Storyblok and the like let you move fast inside a fixed ceiling: developers build the blocks, and your team rearranges them.
Where it stopsAnything genuinely new goes back in the queue.
The familiar path. Every small change waits, the backlog grows, and each campaign ships a little later than the last.
Where it stopsThe site keeps falling behind the team.

We rebuild your site in code, lay Brand Rails so Claude only builds from approved components, set it up on your machine, and stay 30 to 60 days after launch.
Where it goesYour team ships new pages the day they need them, on brand, without a developer.
Questions
No, not for everyday work. Your team builds pages, updates copy, adds schema and ships landing pages by describing them to Claude. Genuinely new components come through us, or Claude drafts one for you to review. When Frankly brought an SEO agency onto their new site, the agency needed no onboarding instructions.
Frankly had just finished a new Webflow site too. Mickey called the switch “a tough sell.” Leadership agreed once they saw a campaign page go up in an afternoon. And usually only the content has to move, so the new pages you paid for become the design you rebuild from.
Not if the migration is done properly. Every URL gets a one-to-one redirect, and metadata, structured data and performance are checked against a migration checklist before launch.
Everything you have today comes across. After launch, you add more by asking: “Add FAQ schema to the pricing page.” Redirects aren't locked behind a pricing plan.
Sanity has a visual editor for changing text and images directly. The Claude workflow is the fast path, not the only one.
Two to three weeks for a migration: your current design and content, rebuilt on the new stack. 10–12 weeks if we redesign first, with design and build running in parallel, so changing platform doesn't add a phase.
Then we start there. We don't write copy until the positioning is right. Once you're live, rewriting a page is a sentence, not a project.
Show them the velocity. At Frankly, one campaign page was what changed leadership's mind. Before your call, we'll send you a one-page case for your CEO covering what changes, what it costs and what stops needing a queue.
Who it's for
Whether you lead creative or marketing, the same setup does a different job for you.
If you lead creative
Want three versions of the homepage before you choose? Ask for a toggle and click between them. Experiments that used to need a sprint now take an afternoon.
If you lead marketing
What makes a site feel like quality is built into the components. A page your team ships is made of the same parts as the one we designed.